Over on 35mmc, Babak Farshcian wrote a detailed article about his process for collecting metadata for his analogue photography using the Android app, Exif Notes. While I found the article interesting, I don't use Android1, so I focused on reading about his process and reasoning.
For me, the inability to automatically capture metadata is one deficiency of film photography, and one of the reasons I abandoned 35mm film for digital in 1999. While analogue photography is still part of my photographic hobby, I do it more like a nostalgic “fun thing” to do, and I won't be in a darkroom lab anytime soon.
When I use my Fuji X-T2, the date, time, ISO, shutter speed, aperture, focal length, exposure compensation, camera model, lens model and location are all automatically recorded into the image file, even when I shoot in full manual mode. With analogue photography, nothing is registered into the medium. It has been challenging.
With the Spotmatic II, I set the aperture and shutter speed manually. The Pentax ES II has aperture-priority auto-exposure. I don’t know what shutter-speed the camera’s exposure system has chosen. I started using the Byword app to take notes when I am using one of my Asahi Pentax Spotmatic II or Pentax ES II camera, but it was tedious to use. I had accepted that the camera model, lens model, and ISO information are the only practical bits of information I could track effortlessly.
When I develop my film, I have the negatives scanned to JPEG files so that I can later add the camera, lens and film information via Exif Editor, assuming I know it. When using adapted legacy prime lenses on my Fujifilm X-T2 the lens information and aperture values are not recorded into the RAF digital file. Sometimes I will use one aperture for the entire shoot and then use Exif Editor to add the missing information.
A few people in the comment section of Babak’s article mentioned some iPhone apps they have used to help capture information for each frame. One such app was PhotoExiF which I installed and configured. I can see how it will make it easier to track shot information when using my film cameras or when using adapted legacy lenses on my Fuji X-T2.
But there are some drawbacks to the app. The small text orange coloured is barely legible, a challenge for my 54-year-old eyes to read. A separate macOS app, PhotoExifDesktop, is needed to make full use of the XML file exported from the iOS app. The developer didn’t sign this free app with an Apple-approved digital certificate. macOS won’t install the app unless I bypass the security settings on macOS. That’s not going to happen2.
Also mentioned in the comments is Film Rolls, an app which is easier for me to use (legible text) than the PhotoExiF app. I had no problems adding information about a few lenses and cameras and creating an entry for a roll of film. Adding frame info was quick and painless.
However, the app documentation requires using iTunes to export an XML file. Of course, iTunes no longer exist, but the export can be done from the Finder app. The app makes it faster to capture exposure information when shooting but don’t reduce the effort needed to add information to the image files. Adding meta-data to images is still a process of reading the XML and manually tagging each file.
I have recently scanned some old family photos to digital. The photographs are no less significant because I don’t know when/where/how they ware taken. But storytelling elders can help give context and meaning to old photographs. My mom has helped identify people and places with handwritten notes on the back of some of the prints. I imported the scanned images into Adobe Lightroom and tagged and caption each scan.
I will never receive an award for how hard it was to take a photograph, and I want to have metadata information, but I think that jumping through hoops to get that metadata gets in the way of being in the moment with my photography.Submitted as part of the 100DaysToOffload project.
- I’ve never owned an Android device. Except for a Dell laptop running Windows XP, BSD UNIX and Linux were my defaults until the switch to Mac. The server hosting this website is all Linux. ↩
- I've worked in cyber-security for almost two decades. In my knowledgeable opinion, installing unsigned software is very much like having unprotected sex with a random stranger during a global pandemic. ↩
MichaelStephenWills24th June 2020 at 8:39 AM
I recently purchased a waiter style wine opener....don't know why I waited so long.
Khürt Williams24th June 2020 at 9:23 AM
The one in the photo was so good, I bought a second one. Bhavna claims she needs all the wine to help put up with being married to me. ?
Jim Grey24th May 2020 at 8:45 AM
I too wish for metadata on my film photographs. I add some to each scan: author, camera, lens, film, subject. I used to geotag each photo, too, but finally quit it because it's tedious. I still do it for road-trip photos though.
At least for me, however, I seldom look at the ISO, shutter speed, and aperture settings my digital cameras record. Once in a great while.
Khürt Williams24th May 2020 at 9:43 AM
Same for me. The metadata is there and I display it on my blog post because over the years readers have asked to see it. But for me, I think date/time and location are more important.
When we tell stories of our adventures, We often start with phrases that are similar to "remember that time last summer/winter/spring/fall when we were at ..."
Jim Grey24th May 2020 at 9:45 AM
Truth. Sometimes I regret no longer geocaching everything. Sometimes.
Daniel Brinneman23rd May 2020 at 10:11 AM
Exif editor link not linked correctly https://exifeditor.com/
Delete this comment after updating post
Khürt Williams23rd May 2020 at 11:23 AM
Thank Daniel. For some reason, the link was posted incorrectly as "https://exifeditor.com" with the quotes, which of course doesn't work. I fixed it.