Compared to my Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR lens, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is very light. It weighs 430g, just slightly less than two Apple iPhone 11 Pros. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is smaller and less expensive than the Fujinon XF35mmF1.4 R1. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R lens has a noticeable taper from the camera mount toward the end of the lens barrel, which is, along with the lens mini lens cap, a design that is not to my liking. I wish Fujifilm would make a wether resistant version of the Fujinon XF35F1.4 R.

Like most Fujinon lens, the Made in Japan Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR lens is an all-metal design and feels solid in my hand. The filter threads are metal. The front barrel is metal. The focus ring is metal. The aperture ring is metal. So that you get it; this is an all-metal lens. The R means the lens has an aperture ring while the WR signifies weather resistance. The aperture rings had a noticeable click when moving between the 13 step f/stops. The focus ring is smooth and continuous, and superfluous.

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR has a close focus distance of 35 centimetres, but an iPhone 11 Pro can focus at a closer subject distance. This fact may not matter to the target audience for this lens; street photographers. For my test, I used the lens around Princeton, New Jersey, and Brooklyn, New York. The auto-focus felt fast, and the images are sharp.

I didn't include them here, but you can see images captured with the lens wide open on this entry for a craft ale.

If you choose to purchase this lens, please use Ritchie Roesch's affiliate link. I don't have one of my own.

  • Name: Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR
  • Tested on: Fujifilm X-T2
  • Mount: Fujifilm X-Mount
  • Zoom/Prime: Prime
  • Focal Length: 35mm (53mm FF FOV)
  • Maximum Aperture: f/2
  • Minimum aperture: f/16
  • Diaphragm Blades: (Rounded 9-Blade Diaphragm)
  • Product Ratings (1=miserable, 5=excellent):
    • Construction Quality: 4.7
    • Image Quality: 4.3
    • Overall Value For Price: 4.7
    • Recommended: Yes

Lens Photos

Using a technique I learned in the Princeton Photo Workshop Landscape / Cityscape in B&W with Ossian Lindholm workshop, the images were created from Fujifilm RAF files, cropped and aligned in Adobe Lightroom, and processed to black and white monochrome in Silver Efex Pro 2. For SOOC JPEGs of the sample images, read my Fujifilm Film Simulation Challenge Roll 3: Tri-X Push article.

Waiting | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
A Taste of Italy | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
Window Light | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
Lost in thought | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
Men's | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
Boots | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
Sun in my eyes | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
Intersection | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
Food is our common ground. | FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400

  1. I will rent the Fujinon XF35mmF1.4 R to test at some point. 

For this 36 frame "roll of film" for the Film Simulation Challenge, I chose to use Ritchie's [[Not] My Fujifilm X-Pro2 Tri-X Push-Process] which is Luis Costa's Black and White recipe which is based on ACROS. I'll let Luis describe the recipe.

When it comes to monochrome images, I still use the same recipe that I came up with once I upgraded to an X-trans III camera a few years ago. I’m a fan of contrasty, grainy images when it comes to B&W, so I experimented a bit and discovered that the Acros film sim when shot at high ISOs produces some very film-like grain, which looks much more natural than the grain effect in the film sim settings. This works particularly well with older legacy lenses, because of their natural imperfections compared to current lenses.Luis Costa

And here's what Ritchie wrote about that recipe:

The film simulation recipe that Luis invented produces results that resemble Kodak Tri-X 400 film that’s been pushed one or perhaps one-and-a-half stops, and I would add using Agfa Rodinal. The grain pattern and structure isn’t a 100% match, but for straight-out-of-camera results, it’s pretty darn convincing. I’ve only been using it for a week, but it has already become one of my favorites! It’s better than my Acros Push-Process recipe that I use frequently, and I like that one a lot, too.Ritchie Roesch

And the following set of images is what results when I don't read the fine print, and my wife drives me into Princeton on a sunny, cloudless fall afternoon w, here I spend 45 minutes walking around capturing high contrast scenes at ISO 400. This recipe is meant to be used at high ISO, between 3200 & 12800, and I shot the whole roll of 36 on the wrong ISO setting.

This is one reason why shooting film sucks and why most professional photographers that I know, including ones who were in the industry for several decades, switched to digital a long time ago. Whether it's sniffing chemicals in some dark, dingy hole or clicking and dragging, their clients don't care how you got the shot. They don't care about "slowing down" or "decisive moments" or shooting only in manual or with primes or any of that other mental junk that amateurs spend their time debating. They get paid for results.

If you shoot film and process film, I hope you enjoy it. If you shoot and process digital, I hope you enjoy doing that. Just don't tell me that one or the other has some sort of magical property. I rarely post straight-out-of-the-camera images on this website.

I have a roll of Kodak Tri-X 400 in my Asahi Optical Co. Spotmatic II. I have been waiting for an opportunity to shoot that roll, which I now know from this experience with the film simulation recipe must be a cloudy or overcast day. It will soon be winter in New Jersey and I expect I will have a lot of cloudy, grey, dreary days.

From the SOOC JPEG, you see here; I did not get good results. These are the best of the shots. The rest are all blown out in highlights. I rented a Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR (~52mm full-frame FOV) for the week and through the week and decided to try it out. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR performed admirably despite my ineptitude. A few of the shots were out of focus, which is also operator error.

I took a landscape and cityscape in B&W workshop a few weeks ago. I think I will process the same set of RAF images using the techniques I learned in that course. The results won't be based on any films except the one I invent in my head.

FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400
FujiFilm X-T2 | Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR | f/5.6 | ISO 400