The reaction by some Mastodon instance admins in joining a ANTI-META FEDI PACT to block Meta's Threads joining the Fediverse is hypocritical. They are essentially acting as gatekeepers to prevent alleged possible gatekeeping. Here's a list of instance admins/mods who have agreed to block Threads:https://fedipact.online/
Avoid these instances. Quoting John Gruber on BlueSky:
Masto zealots: We’re open, federate with us!
Instagram: Great, we’re building a new thing to join you.
Masto zealtots: Not that kind of open!
#fedipact #fediverse #Threads #IndieWeb #OpenWeb #gatekeeping
@khurtwilliams Yes, please do avoid these instances — your good self, and everyone who sees this the same way. It would be excellent if you would all avoid these instances ?? #fediPact
@khurtwilliams As someone who's relatively new to Mastodon, what's the big issue with Threads being available on Fediverse?
@chronocide There is no issue for me. I want an #openweb.
But when Meta added #ActivyPub support to Threads to allow federation between Threads and Mastodon there was a kneejerk response from some Mastodon instance admins. They blocked Threads federation.
I want an #openweb. This is why I transitioned from and stopped my financial support to photog.social and moved to indieweb.social. photog.social is blocking Threads federation.
Links:
https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2023/07/what-to-know-about-threads/
https://engineering.fb.com/2024/03/21/networking-traffic/threads-has-entered-the-fediverse/
https://www.theverge.com/24107998/threads-fediverse-mastodon-how-to