Goodbye Fujicolor Pro 400H

This year may be the last time I use Fujicolor Pro 400H film. I'm ok with that.

Sometime last week, citing challenges sourcing materials, Fujifilm announced the discontinuation of production and sale of Fujicolor Pro 400H, a popular daylight-balanced colour negative film . The psychological reactions from photographers on the interweb are as varied as one would expect. While some photographers are dealing with feelings of loss, some other photographers are dealing with feelings of denial, and some are accepting of the reality of what professional photographers have known for decades. The film industry is in a long and slow death spiral. Will some film photography be around in thirty years? Perhaps, but it most likely will resemble the horse and buggy industry1.

Sourlands Ecosystem Preserve
Sourlands Ecosystem Preserve | Fujicolor Pro 400H Film Simulation | June 2020 | FujiFilm X-T2 | XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR

The resolution of 35mm film cannot compete with modern digital sensors. 120 film beats the highest modern digital medium format cameras. The grain of 35mm film is unmistakable, and in many circumstances, is considered obtrusive. The fact of the matter is every professional photographer believes in the benefits of modern technology currently available in newer digital cameras. After developing about 4000 35mm film frames, you would spend enough to buy a brand-new full-frame digital camera when comparing costs. The economics of the film industry is not sustainable. Film production uses chemicals and processes that are not eco-sustainable. Perhaps we could do more to focus our efforts on cleaning up the film industry while developing digital workflows to re-create whatever it is about the film that we enjoy. The only advantage is film photography is the availability and affordability of medium and large format cameras.

Kodak Portra 160 35mm Colour Negative Film
Avalon Beach | Kodak Portra 160 35mm Colour Negative Film | August 2020 | Minolta X-700 | 50mm f/1.7 MD Rokkor-X

Whether the remaining stock of Fujicolor Pro 400H is bought up by obstinate photographers stuck in unchanging "no growth" mindsets or casual photographers, or Internet opportunist is irrelevant. Like my father and father-in-law, Fujicolor Pro 400H is gone. Acknowledge your grief and cry. Then go find creativity to ways to work around the problem. I think digital photographers are inventive, creative and brilliant. Don't let the worship of long-dead film photographers put chains around that.

Last year, while I was locked down at home bored, I rekindled, after a nearly 30 years hiatus, my joy of 35mm film photography. My father and father-in-law were avoided casual photographers, and after their passing, I developed a nostalgia for old things (including record players) from my lived experience. I was also experimenting with digital film simulation. During the Spring and Summer of last year, I experimented with various digital film simulation recipes via Ritchie Roesch's film simulation challenge. Ritchie has a good eye for colour, experience with film photography, and has created several dozen film simulations. His work shows ingenuity and a willingness to experiment and build community, a tendency I don't see as much with film photographers.

Kodak Portra 160 Film Simulation
Avalon Beach | Kodak Portra 160 Film Simulation | August 2020 | FujiFilm X-T2 | XF27mmF2.8

I shot a roll of Fujicolor Pro 400H Film Simulation and loved how it rendered the greens. My wife and I spent a lot of time hiking in the local woods and forests during the spring and summer last year, and I was excited to run a roll into a film camera. I read up on Fujicolor Pro 400H but had problems purchasing it, and my Pentax ES II was out for repair. Eventually, I had some in hand and started and completed a roll of Fujicolor Pro 400H in Autumn. Fujicolour Pro 400H tends toward green and magenta which I think are just perfect for landscape photography and "non-white" skin portraits.

When I read the announcement, I went online to find some 35mm rolls to shoot in my Minolta XD-11 this summer. Film Photography Project, Amazon and B&H Photo were sold out, but I found that I had already put one roll in Adorama shopping cart some months ago. I bought five rolls of 135. It may be the last five rolls of Fujicolor Pro 400H 35mm film I ever shoot. I'm ok with that.


  1. I think that some photographers care more about saving the film industry than the North Atlantic right whale

Found Film: Kodak UltraMax 400 in a Canon EOS Rebel 2000

I found an expired and partially exposed roll of Kodak UltraMax 400 35mm film in Dad's old Canon EOS Rebel 2000/EOS 300.

Several years ago Dad sent me his Canon Rebel EOS 2000 35mm film camera. I was surprised when the package arrived in the mail and called Dad for an explanation. He explained that he wanted to upgrade his Canon to digital and wanted me to find out what needed to be done. I was confused by this request. I explained to Dad that his camera was a 35mm consumer film camera, and that conversion was not possible. After some questioning, we both came to realise what had caused Dad to think could modify his film camera to be a digital camera.

Canon used the EOS Rebel 2000 branding for the United States market, but the camera was sold internationally as the EOS 300 and EOS Kiss III in Japan. The Canon Rebel EOS 2000/EOS 300 came with a Canon EF28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 II kit lens. The Rebel EOS 2000/EOS 300 was a consumer-level 35mm single-lens reflex camera produced from 1999 to 2002 and sold exceedingly well and dominated its market sector.

Canon EOS 300
Canon EOS 300. Ansgar Koreng / CC BY-SA 4.0

When Canon moved their EOS product line to digital, they kept the naming convention. The original Canon EOS (Electro-Optical System) product line was a set of autofocus single-lens reflex (SLR) cameras introduced in 1987. In 2000 Canon released a new line of digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras with EOS Rebel branding. In 2012, Canon introduced a line of mirrorless-interchangeable-lens (MILC) cameras using the EOS M naming convention. Canon put the letter “D”, for digital, after the model number to designate the model as a digital model. These newer cameras used a new EF-S electronic system, but existing EF lenses were compatible with the more contemporary EF-S mount. In 2003, Canon introduced the EOS 300D marked in the USA as the EOS Digital Rebel and Japan as the EOS Kiss Digital. It seems that Canon likes reusing product names.

Canon EOS 300D
Canon EOS 300D. Sven Storbeck, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Because the camera model had the number 2000 confused Dad, he had probably read that the 2000 cameras were digital. Unless you are a savvy consumer, it is easy to get confused, and my Dad was probably in his early stages of Lewy body dementia. Dad was disappointed, but he told me to keep the camera. I advised him to buy a good quality smartphone.

Last year while cleaning out my photography clutter, I found Dad's Rebel EOS 2000/EOS 300 in a box with a partially exposed 36 exposure roll of Kodak UltraMax 400 (35mm) Colour Negative Film still in the film chamber. I think Dad exposed about 10 of the frames. Storing the camera in the basement all those years was not a good idea. The camera body and lens had a lot of dust, and the lens looked a bit “cloudy”. I popped in a new battery anyway and spent a week shooting the remaining frames. I assumed the film roll had been in the camera since Dad sent it to me, but I was curious about whether the unexposed frames were usable.

They were not. I sent the roll of film to The Darkroom for developing and scanning. Only a few frames were remote usable. Those are the ones I have included here. The interesting and perhaps exciting bit of finding exposed film is doing the detective work to understand the "who/what/when" of the revealed images after the film roll is developed.

It seems that when Dad exposed this roll, he was in St. Vincent, our homeland, during the yearly Carnival in July. St. Vincent carnival combines European carnival traditions with the religious customs of freed West African slaves. Vincy Mass is the biggest festival in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. The celebration starts in the middle of June, culminating in a Monday and Tuesday in July. The main town, Kingstown, is filled with street parties, calypso and steel pan performances, and costume parades. The last two days of Vincy Mas are Mardi Gras and J'Ouvert, a contraction of the French term Jour Overt meaning early morning. J'Ouvert runs from midnight to dawn. I don't know who the people are in the photos below, but those are Carnival "revellers" dressed in costume for what must have been a parade.

Canon EOS Rebel 2000 | EF28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 II | Kodak UltraMax 400

The photos below are of our family home's backyard. The house is on Dorsetshire Hill Road just east of Kingstown harbour. In one of the frames, probably taken from the veranda at the front of the house, you can see Kingstown Harbour. The back lawn used to be lush with a yard full of trees when I was a child.

Canon EOS Rebel 2000 | EF28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 II | Kodak UltraMax 400
Canon EOS Rebel 2000 | EF28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 II | Kodak UltraMax 400
Canon EOS Rebel 2000 | EF28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 II | Kodak UltraMax 400
Canon EOS Rebel 2000 | EF28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 II | Kodak UltraMax 400

New York Camera of Princeton

[quote="Tobias_Mann, post:3, topic:44"]
I’d love to hear more about your editing regiment. Also how/where do you get your film processed/scanned.
[/quote]

I have, for the last few months, sent my film to The Darkroom for developing and scanning. Perhaps it was COVID isolation but, despite the proximity, I had not been to downtown Princeton for several months and had forgotten that we still had a camera shop, which is odd, because I bought an M42 lens there last year. COVID fog? ?????

In any case, I called the shop (New York Camera), and they offer full film services. I’ll spend my money locally from now on. I also bought an Epson V600 film/print scanner to help my wife’s family archive old family photos. We’re at the age when elders are dying, and we want to preserve some history for our children. I want to scan some of the negatives myself and compare to the professional scans.

My film edits are minor, usually involving perspective correction. Unless I use a tripod, I tend to lean. I may also do some lift shadows/highlights as needed. For digital, I tend to play with the sliders in Lightroom, shifting shadows, mid-tones, and highlights more because digital is more forgiving.

The hardest job of the photographer is seeing the way the camera sees. ~ David duChemin

Submitted for the 100DaysToOffload project.