E-M5 @ 50mm , ISO 1250 , 1/125s , ƒ/8 by Khürt Williams
Over the summer I rented the Fuji X-E1 and last week I borrowed my friend’s Olympus PEN EP-3. I like both cameras but the each had faults. The Fuji X-E1 had a slow (electronic viewfinder) and auto-focus (AF) and the Olympus PEN EP-3 had no EVF. The Fuji X-E1, however, convinced me that the CSC format could produce excellent results. I also loved the retro film camera look and feel of some of the cameras.
E-M5 @ 50mm , ISO 1600 , 1/125s , ƒ/8 by Khürt Williams
Before my friend offered to loan me his EP-3 I had ordered a rental, the OM-D EM-5, from Lensrentals along with the Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm F3.5-6.3 lens. I had the weekend to try what is considered the high-end of Olympus line. Of course, Olympus announced an update to the EM-5, the EM-1, so I was testing out the deprecated technology.
This article isn’t a review1. It’s more my thought and impressions on the EM-5. The camera is about the same size as the EP-3. The EVF worked better than I expected. The EVF in the Fuji X-E1 felt quite slow and couldn’t keep up with the fast movement of the camera for tracking running kids, flying birds etc. The EM-5 tracked well. I didn’t notice any lag. Setting the camera up was quite easy. It’s quite light. Battery life isn’t quite up to the level I expected. It’s a lot worse than the Nikon. After just one day of shooting, about 100 images, the battery was exhausted. I can easily get three to four full days of shooting out of my Nikon D5100’s battery. Perhaps the EM-1 is better.
The images below give you a decent idea what to expect from the EM-5. Since the D5100 has an APS-C sensor with a 1.5 crop factor and the EM-5 has a micro four-thirds sensor with a crop factor of 2.0 I used my AF-S Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 G lens and the set the 12-50 mm lens to 26mm. This means that both cameras were shooting at the 35mm equivalent of 52mm. Both cameras were set to ISO 200 and f/8 in aperture priority mode. I couldn’t see much of a difference between these two images (other than the slightly different crop). The EM-5 images seem to have more contrast and the colours are more vivid but this may be some setting that I overlooked or the slightly different aperture. The EM-5 felt tiny in my hand. In fact, I missed having a grip to hold the camera one-handed.
E-M5 @ 26mm , ISO 200 , 1/100s , ƒ/5.6 by Khürt Williams on 19 October, 2013
The Nikon with the AF-S Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G at f/6.3.
NIKON D5100 @ 35mm , ISO 200 , 1/60s , ƒ/6.3 by Khürt Williams on 20 October, 2013
The Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm F3.5-6.3 is a macro lens. I shot the spider at f/10 to provide enough DOF to capture the spider in focus. Once turned on the lens locks in at 43mm. It’s very easy to use and I love the results.
Given that Sony, Fuji and Olympus announced new cameras and lenses this month I have a lot of choices. PhotoPlus Expo is coming up and I may have an opportunity to try out the new Sony A7, the Olympus OM-D EM-1 and the Fuji X-E2. I am very excited about the X-E2. Early reports are that Fuji has fixed the problems exhibited by the X-E1. If so then my decision will be even harder. The results from these CSC cameras makes me wonder if I can just replace my DSLR altogether.
E-M5 @ 43mm , ISO 200 , 1/160s , ƒ/10 by Khürt Williams on 19 October, 2013
E-M5 @ 50mm , ISO 1600 , 1/125s , ƒ/6.3 by Khürt Williams on 18 October, 2013
E-M5 @ 50mm , ISO 250 , 1/125s , ƒ/6.3 by Khürt Williams on 18 October, 2013
E-M5 @ 50mm , ISO 3200 , 1/60s , ƒ/8 by Khürt Williams on 18 October, 2013