NOTE: I’ll begin this experience report with a brief disclaimer. It’s been less than three years since I’ve returned to shooting 35mm film after switching to digital photography over 20 years ago. I’ve inundated myself in as much film education as I could find between web articles and advice from experienced film shooters. But, with my former experience way in the past and limited recent experience, this review is coming from a relative novice point of view.
The 36 exposure roll of Rollei RPX 100 was exposed between January 2021 and February 2021. The subject matter is uninteresting. This was my first time shooting a roll of Rollei RPX 100. The images are shown above and below are among the best frames from the roll and my two favourites. The remaining frames were either badly exposed, or the subject matter was uninteresting.
The Rollei RPX 100 scans do not appear to have a lot of contrast, but I love how the whites are rendered.
The 24 exposure roll of Svema Foto 200 was exposed between March and April 2021. Unfortunately, I forgot the roll was still in the camera. A few weeks ago, when I opened the back of my Minolta XD-11 to load a roll of Vision 250D, I exposed the roll. Ugh! There were far fewer keepers than with the registration of Rollei RPX 100.
The Svema Foto 200 appears to have more contrast than the Rollei RPX 100 but I’m not happy with the result from either of these 35 B&W film stock.