Blog

Black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus)

On Monday, just after lunch, I grabbed the X-T3 and XF150-600mmF5.6-8 R LM OIS WR drove the car and parked on Princeton Avenue just before the border with Rocky Hill. Just off the path leading to Van Horne Park there's a "catchment area" that has morphed into a large pond and it that has become part of the watershed. The catchment area was built to collect rainwater flowing off the large parking lot owned by the Audi car dealership. I’m unsure if this is intentional but tall reeds, the ones that are commonly found in wetland environments such as marshes and swamps, are growing out of the "pond".

Catchment areas can create watersheds that play an important role in maintaining water quality and managing flood risks in communities. Reeds are important components of wetland ecosystems, providing habitat and food for various wildlife species and helping to stabilise soil and control erosion along water bodies. Where I sat on the cement wall bordering the pond, I could hear frogs croaking and splashing in the water below.

I photographed dragonflies in this location a few years ago. I knew it was too early for dragonflies but I thought perhaps I would see some birds. As I sat on the wall I could hear various species of birds singing in the still leafless trees that lined the path and ringed the "pond". The Merlin app identified, black-capped chickadees, northern flickers and northern cardinals. I could hear them but I was growing frustrated that I did not see them.

Black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) · 25 March 2024 · FujiFilm X-T3 · XF150-600mmF5.6-8 R LM OIS WR

After 30 fruitless minutes, I was ready to leave when I noticed movement in a small bush that had just started to show some early spring leaves. It took me a few minutes but the bird, which I later identified as a black-capped chickadee, finally landed in a spot where I could get a clean portrait.

Sunday Paper

The Online Photographer (TOP) handles a topic, depth of field, that I have wanted to write about for a while but I know their version is less offensive than what I would have written. I admit that I was also guilty in the past of spreading the equivalent aperture myth.

First, I've observed (over many years of observing) that EA is almost always asserted (not always, so don't take offense, please) as an argument against smaller-than-FF sensors, and of the superiority of FF sensors and fast lenses. Second, people seldom point out that you can get even shallower DoF with larger-than-FF formats. The reason for the latter is probably because shallow DoF isn't actually the point. Showing that one's camera is cooler and mo bettah and more he-man than gnarly liddle-sensor cameras and baby zooms is the point. Third are all those people who shoot wide open all the time even when they shouldn't, getting important areas of the image (like the dog's nose) out of focus even when more DoF would be better for the picture. Third are all those people who shoot wide open all the time even when they shouldn't, getting important areas of the image (like the dog's nose) out of focus even when more DoF would be better for the picture.f/1.7 is ƒ/1.7 (Don't Be a Looser)

After reading this old TOP post by Mike, I have decided to learn a new macOS or Lightroom short every day until the end of the month.

I damn sure don't know everything Photoshop can do. Furthermore, I'm secretly convinced no one does. That's right...my superstitious, primitive, ignorant folk belief is that there is not one being in the Universe who knows everything Photoshop is capable of. The people who design it sure don't, because they keep adding other ways to do things it can already do. I don't think even AI can know. As in Arthur C. Clarke's short story "The Nine Billion Names of God," perhaps the Universe will end as soon as any single being masters Photoshop completely. Overhead, without any fuss, the stars will go out. I'm joking. Kinda joking. Also a tiny bit…not.In the Era of Tech, Ignorance is Ordinary