Follow Island in the Net on WordPress.com

Apple was right to scrap AirPower.

I have been sceptical of the benefits of wireless chargers for a while. I'm not surprised Apple cancelled this product. To me, the tradeoffs (longer charging cycle, inability to use the device while charging) outweigh the sole benefit; not using a cable. I think wireless chargers, in their current iteration, are not a compelling solution to, in my opinion, a triavial problem. I understand the appeal to consumers. They want a device that is powered by magic. All those power cables are a reminder of the real world.

Someday we may all have fusion power generators in our homes, cars, and portable devices. Eventually, someone will invent a way to store 200 terawatts of electricity in a compact stored energy cell. Someday. But that future isn't now.

Wireless charging pads use electromagnetic induction to juice up your phone. Both the pad and your phone contain wire coils: the pad draws current from the wall and runs it through the coil, creating an electromagnetic field. That field induces an electric current in your phone’s wire coil, which it uses to charge the battery.

However, the electricity being transmitted to your phone isn’t perfectly clean or ideal. It generates some noise, which can interfere with other wireless devices. That’s why the FCC (and regulatory bodies in other countries) set strict limits on wireless emissions.

Noise from a single coil might not be a problem, but each charging coil generates a slightly different waveform. When those waves overlap, the constructive interference intensifies their strength. Just like when two ocean
waves collide and combine their height, radio frequencies can combine their intensity as they interact.iFixit

The hype around AirPower charging was ignoring things that I learned in my Power Systems engineering courses at Georgia Tech over thirty years ago. How were they going to handle electromagnetic interference to other electronic devices? In my youth, my family lived in countries with 240V AC. My father used voltage transformers to provide suitable power to the American made electronics in our home; television, Hi-Fi, etc. The transformers were always warm to the touch, even when the devices were powered down. How was Apple going to handle the heat?

Apple had ambitions to solve these problems. Rene Ritchite wrote on iMore:

It wasn't going to be Qi standard either. Because Qi couldn't do that back then. It was going to be beyond what the Qi standard could do, but Apple said they were going to work with Qi to make it part of a future standard so that everyone could benefit from whatever advancements Apple brought to the table.

But, to date, absolutely no one has been able to do what Apple set out to do with AirPower.

Yeah, not even Apple.

Author: Khürt Williams

A human who works in information security and enjoys photography, Formula 1 and craft ale.

4 thoughts on “Apple was right to scrap AirPower.”

  1. i have 4 around my house, so, they do actually work and i prefer them to plugging in.

    but, they aren't quite there yet... and if apple is going to do it, then, they are going to do it better than anyone else.

    snake oil? you'd have to be more precise as to what you mean is specifically "snake oil".

    1. I removed the snake oil statement. It didn't feel quite right. The way ideas come into my head is sometimes "messy", That's why I used the word inchoate in the website description. 🙂

      I don't think we'll see the sort of product Apple hoped to make for a very long time. Until someone finds a way around the laws of physics, wires will be with us for a very long time.

      My favourite comment from the iFixIt article: https://ifixit.org/blog/14883/what-finally-killed-airpower/#comment-181218

      You can not mix magnets and electromagnetic fields so easy, specially if they are using the magnetic field for induction. I did industrial solutions (design) more than 15years ago.. there is a whole manufacturing line in automotive industry (glaesernemanufactur.de) using induction to power all computers and chargers for tools in the hall. The huge field is even ‚driven‘ thru the building like an airports transport system .. even the aircondition system is going thru this field.. works very well but persons with lifesaving electric devices are not allowed to enter that part of the building. Which is a total nogo for an costumer product. Its nice watching that even apple has to work hard on a vision and sometimes has to make a step backwards. They will have learned a lesson and grow from there.

      1. fair!

        i think apple sees this as a big opportunity... i don't think they'll abandon it completely.

        1. Agreed.

Comments are closed.