My Less Than Satisfactory Experience With Drobo Transporter

crashed vintage plane

The Transporter is a device for creating your own personal cloud storage so that you can have more trust in the privacy and security of your files when compared to services like Dropbox, Google Drive or Box. As a consultant I work remotely from client sites and I often need access to certain files. I've wanted one of these for a while. I finally decided to get Transporter Sync and re-purpose a Seagate FreeAgent Go 250 GB USB 2.0 Portable External Hard Drive that I wasn?t using.

The Sync has no internal storage. Setup was easy. I attach the supported Seagate FreeAgent Go hard drive and attached the Sync to my network via Ethernet and powered on the unit. In less than 10 minutes I had it all up and running. I installed the Transporter Desktop software on my iMac and MacBook Air and was able to copy files to the Transporter folder. The Transporter Sync worked like Dropbox, giving me the ability to drag and drop files into a folder on my iMac and have them sync seamlessly across all my devices. I was able to get access to the files from my iPad and iPhone as well. I was excited.

I use a MacBook Air when working remotely. The Air has a 128GB drive. It's small but large enough for installation of the software I need. Because of this my intention was to use the Transporter Library. The purpose of Transporter Library is to store the folders that I don't want to keep on my computer as local copies, meaning that these folders are assessed only over the network and are stored only on my Transporter. On a Mac, the Transporter Library will actually behave as a remote volume, meaning that any item that you drag into Transporter Library will be copied rather than moved. After making sure that the basic sync function worked, I moved my files to the Transporter Library and looked forward to testing things out from the office the next day.

Once at the remote office, I tried to get access to my files on my MacBook but the Transporter folder was empty and I was not able to get access to the Library folder at all. I went to the Transporter support site and tried some trouble shooting tips from the Knowledge Base. Frustrated, I gave up, expecting that that issue must be on my home setup. When I got home I verified that the Transporters lights were the correct colour. I verified that while on my network, files were being sync between the iMac, Transporter, and MacBook. I verified that I could access the Transport Library.

I came back into the office the next day and tried again. Same result. I decided to open a support ticket. This is where things started going downhill. I submitted my support request on February 19th at 7PM (4PM PST). I got a response on February 21 at 7PM (4PM PST). My Technical Support Agent, Katrina, asked me for some information about my setup including the model number of the Transporter, logs, serial number, location of the Transporter folder, etc. I responded that I had only just setup the device, that the folder was in the default location, that the drive was supported, that the lights were the right colour, and I uploaded the logs she requested. I also noted that I could access the files via my iPad or iPhone while connected to the same remote network as the MacBook.

I got the following message back:

Thank you for the information about the lights and those logs. I've escalated this case to my tier 2. He will be in touch as soon as he has the chance to look over everything here.

That was the last message I received about my issue. No phone calls. No email. This morning -- March 2, 2015 -- I contacted the company via their online chat service. I asked how I could return the device for a refund. I was given a toll-free number to call. When I called around 9AM EST, I got an automated message that said that I was next in the queue and that my wait time was 1 minute. Ten minutes later someone answered the phone. I explained my frustration and asked to be put in touch with someone who could issue me a refund. The person on the phone took down my information and promised someone would call me back. It's 3PM EST and no one has called.

I think this is the worse customer service I have ever encountered. The entire experience has left me frustrated and angry. The device has not been successfully at doing the one thing I want it to do. The Transporter may well be a good product but with I can't recommend it to friend, colleagues and family members.

UPDATE: I checked my email this morning and found this message from Drobo which was sent around 5PM (EST) on March 2nd and it seems someone was trying to reach on my drive home from work:

?Thank you for your messages. I apologize as it should not have taken so long for someone to get back to you. I have pressured this case to my tier 3 escalations engineer. He will be in touch promptly.?

UPDATE: This morning I tried some more trouble shooting. I might as well since tech support isn't helping me at all and customer support hasn't called me about my refund. I connected my MacBook to the guest network on my Apple Airport Express. The guest network is separate from the main network. Guess what? I experience the same issues that I have when I am connected remotely. I am not sure what this means.

UPDATE: I should have checked the reviews on Amazon.com before purchasing the Transporter. There are 119 reviews of the product and 40% are two stars or less. Most of the complaints are about the lackluster customer support.

Working in the software industry, I knew I was dealing with a level 1 support rep and that he wasn’t going to be of any help. I was right. It didn’t take long to be transferred to another rep who asked a few more questions. At least his questions were related to the issue and the platform I was using. Unfortunately, after responding to those questions, there’s been silence. There’s been no response from them on how to proceed, even after updating the ticket with the results from other devices.Gleen on Amazon.com

Leopard just a knockoff of Vista?

http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/islandinthenet/feed/~3/178870001/

I agree with most but not all of his points. I almost did not upgrade to Leopard. What was holding me back was a lack of any “must have it” features. I just did not see any for me, personally. What tipped me into buying was after I read a review of TimeMachine and how it worked.

Currently I use a home made NAS that I cobbled together from an old PC. It works but there is not automated backup and the fan noise from the old motherboard limits its location to the basement. With…

Leopard just a knockoff of Vista?

I agree with most but not all of his points. I almost did not upgrade to Leopard. What was holding me back was a lack of any "must have it" features. I just did not see any for me, personally. What tipped me into buying was after I read a review of TimeMachine and how it worked.

Currently I use a home made NAS that I cobbled together from an old PC. It works but there is not automated backup and the fan noise from the old motherboard limits its location to the basement. With TimeMachine I can attached a FireWire drive to the mac mini in my family room and with a switch backups are less of a chore.

Leopard is a great Operating System and will excite developers more than the normal user. But these new features, although good, aren’t great due to delays and being spoiled early on. I am not dissing Leopard, but this is something that had to happen, and while it was touted as a Vista competitor, it’s more of a pretty knockoff in that Leopard won’t convince you to switch if Tiger didn’t and the ‘Wow’ factor is lacking"

(Via Apple Matters | Mac OS X Leopard: Just a Pretty Vista Knockoff.)